Thursday, June 30, 2011
Selecting The Right Retirement Community
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Looking For More Than Just A Place To Live
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Lavish Incentives To Buy A New Home
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Annenberg Foundation To Consider Scaling Back Its Point Vicente Project
The Annenberg Foundation may scale back its proposal for an animal-focused education center at Lower Point Vicente in response to conversations with federal and state officials who would need to approve the unusual plans for a public park.
A representative of the charitable family foundation said at a Rancho Palos Verdes City Council meeting Tuesday that changes are under consideration for the controversial project, which would create a "discovery park" on vacant, municipally owned coastal land next to the Point Vicente Interpretive Center.
Annenberg and city officials have been seeking clarification from state and federal parks officials on whether the ambitious plan could be built as proposed in light of deed restrictions that require the former military property to be used for passive recreation and as a public park.
"If there are some modifications that address their concerns ... we'll certainly talk about that," said Robert Uram, an attorney speaking on behalf of the Annenberg Foundation.
"The foundation is still very excited about this process, and it's committed to working with the council and the community," Uram added.
The Los Angeles-based foundation wants to use 26 acres at Lower Point Vicente to erect an educational complex that would be focused on "companion animals" and their relationships to humans. The project would include native habitat, trails, a demonstration Tongva village, and adoption suites for 10 dogs and eight cats.
The project has drawn a fierce reaction from local residents opposed to the concept, which would cost more than $40 million and would be funded entirely by the foundation. While some locals have been swayed by the foundation's public outreach and advertising campaign, a sustained and organized opposition has arisen since plans were submitted to the city in 2009.
About a dozen speakers on both sides addressed the council Tuesday, in contrast to previous meetings on the project that have drawn a full house.
Council members, who said little other than to caution audience members that no action was to be taken, voted to receive and file an update from city planners on the project. The item came six months after the council directed city staff to seek a review of the project from state and federal officials, despite not having completed environmental review or the normal local planning process.
That direction, given in December, was prompted by letters of concern from the National Park Service, which oversees the use of former federal land, and from the state parks department's Office of Grants and Local Services. The two agencies said that for the project to move forward, the city might have to seek an exemption to long-standing restrictions on use of the land.
The two possibilities for that are a "public facility" exemption, which would allow the land to be developed if intended for public use, or a "conversion," which would essentially require a swap of new public parkland to replace lost acreage at Lower Point Vicente.
Annenberg officials believe their project constitutes a public facility, but National Park Service officials have said that the project as currently configured would require a conversion.
In a letter sent last week to the National Park Service, Uram wrote that he does not believe a conversion is required.
"We believe the project fully meets the requirements for a public facility ... and that the project should viewed as a model for its innovative approach of using domestic pets as a key interconnection with outdoor recreation and protection of native wildlife and habitat," Uram wrote.
A former U.S. Interior Department attorney who recently joined Annenberg's team, Uram wrote to request a meeting with the service's regional director, based in Oakland.
Annenberg in March submitted an incomplete draft application to state parks officials, but that document has been kept secret. The city's attorney has said the application is exempt from public records requests because is it is preliminary, and city planners said state officials wanted to keep the document private to prevent confusion over possible future changes.
In the meantime, city and Annenberg officials are trying to figure what shape the project could take to gain approval.
"We're trying to get a better understanding and direction from these two agencies in order to know how to really complete this application," Principal Planner Ara Mihranian told the City Council.
A letter sent Monday by foundation Executive Director Leonard Aube to council members said the organization has discussed reducing the size of the main building by 8,000 to 15,000 square feet. The central structure is currently proposed at about 51,000 square feet, including about 9,000 square feet of underground parking.
Aube wrote that he anticipates returning to the City Council with "updated thinking about the proposed infrastructure and program direction" ideally by next month.
City planners would then seek direction from the council on how to proceed, Mihranian said Wednesday.
Note: The article original written by Melissa Pamer @ The Daily Breeze.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
How To Quickly Improve Your Credit Score
Monday, June 20, 2011
Be Specific When Writing Home Purchase Contract
When buying a home, mean what you say and say what you mean when filling out the contract.
That's the advice of lawyer Jeff Marks, a partner with Ryan and Marks Attorneys LLP in Jacksonville, Fla. A real estate dispute in the Sunshine State illustrates his point.
Christine and Nigel Gibney contracted to buy a house from Helen and Randy Pillifant for $620,000. The purchase contract provided that the sale was "contingent upon this property appraising for no less than $620,000," according to court documents.
Two appraisals were done. One arranged by the Gibneys (the buyers) came in at $560,000. The Pillifants secured an appraisal that valued their house at $635,000. The buyers refused to close and terminated the contract.
The sellers sued for breach of contract, arguing that any appraisal of $620,000 or more obligated the Gibneys to buy the house. The Gibneys argued that any appraisal for less than $620,000 allowed them to terminate the contract.
Who's right? Florida's Second District Court of Appeal favored the would-be buyers, ruling in April 2010: "In our view, `appraising for no less than $620,000' means that no appraisal may be less than $620,000," the court ruled. "The appraisal contingency allowed the Gibneys to terminate the contract if any appraisal valued the property at less than $620,000."
Too often, homebuyers and sellers think a contract allows for one thing, when the language says something else.
"Contingencies should be written in full sentences," Marks says. "In this case, it should have read, `This agreement is contingent, at buyers' option, on the property appraising for at least $620,000 as determined by the appraiser for the buyers' lender,"' he says.
"There's no confusion in that language."
Here are four ways to avoid making common contract mistakes.
Give yourself time to get a loan
Many contracts are contingent upon the buyer getting financing by a certain date. In today's tough lending climate, buyers are wise to allow themselves plenty of time to get mortgage approval for a loan.
If the date passes and no financing has been secured, the sellers may terminate the contract and keep the earnest money deposit."You should also be realistic about your closing date," says Patti Lawton, a broker with Welcome Home Realty in Brunswick, Maine. "Don't try to close too quickly. There are a lot of things that need to be done properly and you must give lenders, title companies and others time."
Be specific about which items stay with the house
You've heard the story of the buyer who walked into a new home only to discover that the refrigerator and chandeliers were missing. Check the contract. As a seller, be sure you specifically state on the contract what will stay with the home. As a buyer, pay attention.
Don't assume that the Sub-Zero refrigerator is yours once you close.
Know the effective date
Surprise! The contract doesn't always go into effect on the day you sign it. "In every contract, there are things that must be done within X number of days from the effective date: inspections, loan applications and approval, title searches," Marks says. "If you don't know the date that the contract went into effect, you may not have a valid contract."
Get everyone to sign
"Sometimes the home is owned by both spouses, other owners or an entity such as corporation," Marks says. "Make sure all of the parties sign the contract. If a party to the transaction fails to sign, they're not bound to perform the contract."
You've heard it before: Buying a house is one of the biggest financial decisions you're going to make. Simply said: "Take it seriously and make sure everything that's important to you is in writing," Lawton says.
How To Get The Best Deal When Buying A Home
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Homeowners Are Able To Stop Foreclosure And Strip Down Mortgage Debt
Friday, June 10, 2011
Buying A Home With Bad Credit Is Still An Option
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Delinquent Loan Rules Updated
The new standards require servicers to take a more consistent approach to how they deal with troubled borrowers, beginning in the initial months after a loan becomes delinquent, through any efforts to modify the terms of the loan and, if necessary, through the foreclosure process.
"We want homeowners to be able to understand their options when facing foreclosure, and we want servicers to reach homeowners early in the process, communicate frequently and clearly, and help homeowners avoid foreclosure," said Jeff Hayward, senior vice president of Fannie Mae's national servicing organization.
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Why Renters Should Consider Buying
At some point most renters will take a look around their boxed in apartment and ponder should they be buying a home instead of giving the money away. You pay more in rent and never realize the tax advantages and basically, you’re handing over all the benefits to your landlord.
Stop giving your hard earned money away!
|
That’s because you’ve only heard half the story; of course you can own a home without too much of the hassles.
The hardest part of buying a home these days is having a good enough credit history. I mean with the down slump of this economy, whose credit didn’t become just a bit blemished? Banks have tightened up on their criteria for home loans and are scrutinizing past payment histories a lot more. But credit can always be fixed. It just takes time and you can accomplish a lot in a year?
The Biggest Hurdles to Overcome when Buying a Home:
1. Accumulating a down payment & Settlement Fees
2. Re-establishing Great Credit
These two things are all that is really keeping renters from buying a home. So how do you overcome the issue of having blemished credit and saving enough money when most of it goes to your landlord?
Consider these 3 Little Known Facts That Can Help You Buy Your First Home.
1. Did you know when buying a new home there are government programs to help with down payment assistance? Most are state and city funded programs to help new home buyers. You could get as much as 3% to 5% down payment assistance AND there are other programs that help with both the down payment and settlement fees. These programs have very little budgets so they don’t advertise statewide, however a good realtor will know about the programs.
2. If you have any assets such as stocks, bonds, a car, or anything else of value you can use it as collateral to secure a loan. Get an appraisal and ask your realtor which lenders are more likely to help you finance using this type of asset.
3. You could look for “Lease to Own” properties; Sellers know the market isn’t as steady as we would like and banks have become so strict it’s difficult for people with perfect credit to secure home loans, so sellers will lease their property to you for a specified amount of time with the intent of you buying it down the road. In laymen’s terms, you rent it for perhaps two years with maybe 10% or more of each monthly payment going towards the purchase price (this acts as your down payment). After that two year period you agree to purchase the property. This gives you time to accumulate a down payment and fix any credit problems you may have.
Every renter should speak with a realtor because an informative conversation will cost you nothing but will enlighten you to all the programs available. Isn’t it time to explore your options and learn how your money can benefit you more?